from 01.01.2011 until now
Contractual and Legal Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (Contractual and Legal Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, glavnyy ekspert-specialist)
moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
UDK 343.711.5 Кража со взломом
The author considers the issues of qualification of illegal entry into a dwelling with the use of technical or other means, cites the forms proposed by the legal doctrine for the use of technical means when entering a dwelling. The article analyzes the novels of the Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, which allowed such a possibility; possible cases of non-physical entry into a dwelling using technical means that can be qualified under Article 139 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; problems of delimitation of the acts provided for by Articles 137 and 139 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, among themselves, as well as with other elements of crimes (for example, in the field of computer information). The author comes to the conclusion that, under Article 139 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, only physical penetration into a dwelling, committed both by the perpetrator himself and through the use of various technical means and devices, is subject to the qualification, non-physical penetration into a dwelling is qualified under other elements of crimes of the Russian criminal law.
criminal liability, qualification, constitutional rights, inviolability of the home, penetration into the dwelling, Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
1. Borkov V. N. Qualification of provocative and inflammatory actions of law enforcement officers // Criminal law. 2015. No. 1. P. 16–21. (In Russ.)
2. Klement'eva E. S. Prestupleniya, posyagayuschie na lichnye prava cheloveka // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2005. № 9. S. 20–23.
3. Nurkaeva T. N. Criminal law protection of the individual, her rights and freedoms: questions of theory and practice. M.: Prospekt, 2017. 256 p. (In Russ.)
4. In the case of checking the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Federal Law «On Investigative Activities» on the complaint of citizen I. G. Chernova: determination of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of July 14, 1998 No. 86-O // Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 1998. No. 34. Art. 4368. (In Russ.)
5. Churkin A. V. Investigator enters a home with the help of a computer // Investigator. 1999. No. 1. P. 31–32. (In Russ.)
6. Krasikov A. N. Criminal law protection of human rights and freedoms in Russia. Saratov: Polygraphist, 1996. 211 p. (In Russ.)
7. Serebrennikova A. V. Criminal legal provision of constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen under the legislation of the Russian Federation and Germany. M.: LeksEst, 2005. 303 p. (In Russ.)
8. Novikov V. A. Inviolability of private life as constitutional law and the object of criminal law protection // Legal world. 2014. No. 7. P. 18–21. (In Russ.)
9. Ploshkina Ya. M. Criminal liability for illegal wiretapping and audio and video surveillance of housing under the laws of the Russian Federation and Germany: author. dis. … cand. legal sciences. Krasnoyarsk, 2005. 23 p. (In Russ.)
10. Shelestyukov V. N. Ugolovno-pravovye sredstva obespecheniya neprikosnovennosti zhilischa: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnoyarsk, 2006. 23 s.
11. Chechetin A. E. Operative-search measures and personality rights. Barnaul: Publishing House of the Barnaul Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2006. 148 p. (In Russ.)
12. On some issues of judicial practice in cases of crimes against the constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen (Articles 137, 138, 138.1, 139, 144.1, 145, 145.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation): Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 25, 2018. No. 46 // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2019. No. 2. (In Russ.)
13. Kibalnik A. G., Amvrosov O. P. Qualification of crimes against personal rights and freedoms of a person in the new Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court // Criminal Law. 2019. No. 3. P. 32–36. (In Russ.)
14. Case «Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russian Federation», application no. 14939/03: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 10 February 2009 // The document was not published. Access from the reference legal system «ConsultantPlus» (date of access: 04.07.2022). (In Russ.)
15. Decree of the Lesosibirsk City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory dated October 9, 2017 No. 1-271/2017 // The document was not published. Access from AIPS «SudAkt.ru»: database of judicial and regulatory acts (date of access: 04.07.2022). (In Russ.)
16. Pikurov N. I. Private life and criminal law: the search for a balance of interests of the state and the individual. M.: Yurayt, 2021. 207 p. (In Russ.)
17. Koryakovtsev V. V., Pitulko K. V., Sergeeva A. A. Peculiarities of criminal law protection of constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens in Russian and foreign legislation. St. Petersburg: Alef-Press Publishing House, 2021. 195 p. (In Russ.)
18. On judicial practice in cases of theft, robbery and robbery: Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 27, 2002 No. 29 // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2003. No. 2. (In Russ.)
19. Yani P. S. Qualification of theft with illegal entry into a dwelling, premises or other storage: the position of the courts // Legitimacy. 2016. No. 2. P. 38–43. (In Russ.)
20. Klementieva E. S. Crimes that infringe on personal human rights // Russian investigator. 2005. No. 9. P. 20–23. (In Russ.)
21. Shelestyukov V. N. Criminal-legal means of ensuring the inviolability of the home: author. dis. … cand. legal sciences. Krasnoyarsk, 2006. 23 p. (In Russ.)
