UDK 343.139 Судебное разбирательство. Судебное следствие. Общий ход разбирательства дела. Обвинительные речи. Защитительные речи. Ведение протокола. Закрытое разбирательство
The article analyzes the provisions of the criminal procedure legislation providing for the duration of the application of detention after the referral of a criminal case to the court. Problems such as the lack of a maximum period of judicial detention for certain categories of crimes, the excessive duration of the initial application of the coercive mechanism, and the lack of a legitimate reason for extending further isolation when returning a criminal case to the prosecutor require further resolution at the regulatory level in order to form uniform judicial practice.
preventive measure, detention, deadline, return of the criminal case, court, prosecutor
1. Bulatov B. B., Muravyov K. V. Institute of preventive measures in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: development dynamics and improvement prospects // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2021. No. 6. P. 23–30. (In Russ.)
2. Ermakova A. L. Preventive measures related to isolation from society: terms of application and crediting to punishment // Bulletin of Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2024. No. 1. P. 85–289. (In Russ.)
3. Samylina I. A. Reasonable terms in criminal proceedings // Russian Justice. 2009. No. 4. P. 48–52. (In Russ.)
4. Trukhachev V. V. Maximum terms of preliminary investigation and trial of criminal cases // Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. 2012 (1). P. 445–453. (In Russ.)
5. Zolotarev E. V. Current issues of applying detention as a preventive measure: abstract dis. ... Cand. of Law. M., 2006. 17 p. (In Russ.)
6. Dolgushin D. A. Implementation by the court of control over the legality and validity of the selection and application of preventive measures in the form of house arrest and detention // Theory and practice of social development. 2010. No. 4. P. 190–194. (In Russ.)
7. Muravyov K. V. Optimization of criminal proceedings as a form of application of the criminal law : dis. ... Doctor of Law. Omsk, 2018. 505 p. (In Russ.)
8. Kuryakhova T. V. Features of extending the maximum period of detention in custody in a criminal case returned by the court // Legislation and practice. 2018. No. 1. P. 51–54. (In Russ.)
9. Kornukov V. M. Conflict of Interests in Russian Criminal Procedure Law from the Perspective of Its Historical Development // Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2014. No. 4. P. 597–602. (In Russ.)
10. Khitrova O. V. Special Procedure for Moving a Criminal Case or Returning a Criminal Case for Additional Investigation? // Russian Investigator. M. : Jurist, 2013. No. 21. P. 13–16. (In Russ.)
11. Bobovkin M. V., Ruchkin V. A., Aisina E. R. Legal Status of a Convict When Returning a Criminal Case to the Prosecutor at the Cassation Appeal Stage // Legal Concept. 2022. No. 2. P. 60–67. (In Russ.)
12. Zagorsky G. I., Kobzarev F. M., Shalumov M. S. Selection of a preventive measure in the form of detention and the terms of detention: some theoretical and legal issues // Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Law. 2020. No. 38. P. 42–50. (In Russ.)
13. Sidorenko M. V. Legal positions of acts of constitutional justice in the context of the Plain Meaning Rule // Scientific Bulletin of Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2018. No. 1. P. 65–69. (In Russ.)
14. Chervotkin A. S. Detention upon return of a criminal case to the prosecutor // Criminal Procedure. 2016. No. 5. P. 66–73. (In Russ.)
15. Alekperov R. R. On the use of detention in the Republic of Belarus and in the legislation of other member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States // Bulletin of Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2020. No. 2 (26). P. 51–58. (In Russ.)
16. Sheremetyev A. P. On limiting the excessive length of criminal proceedings and the period of detention of the accused // Russian Law Journal. 2012. No. 6. P. 141–145. (In Russ.)
