from 01.01.2023 to 01.01.2024
Ufa Law Institute of the Russian Interior Ministry (Ad'yunktura Ufimskogo Yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii)
Ufa, Ufa, Russian Federation
The research is devoted to the criminal law analysis of the retrospective of the indictment according to the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR of 1922. Separate provisions of the contents of the indictment documents are considered on the example of archival cases from the period of adoption of this document. The structure and criminal procedural aspects of the final indictment of the preliminary investigation under the Criminal Procedure Code of 1922 and the current Criminal Procedure Code are comparable. The study analyzes similarities and differences, the procedure for formulating charges, as well as the law enforcement practice of drafting a document. The final part summarizes the results, identifies general trends in improving the indictment from the regulatory and law enforcement side.
indictment, comparative legal analysis, Criminal Procedure Code of 1922, preliminary investigation, retrospective, structure and content, formulation of the charge
1. Gumerov T. A. The mechanism for accepting an indictment. Problems, theory and practice // Actual problems of economics and law. 2017. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 152–159. (In Russ.)
2. Morgacheva E. N. Comparative historical method. Review of approaches to classification in social sciences // Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series “Psychology. Pedagogy. Education”. 2016. No. 2 (4). 2016. P. 102–114. (In Russ.)
3. Kalyuzhny A. N., Chaplygina V. N. Comparative analysis of preliminary investigation under the Charter of Criminal Procedure of 1864 and the Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR of 1922 // Actual problems of Russian law. 2015. No. 1. P. 155–160. (In Russ.)
4. Alimamedov E. N. The structure and content of the indictment as a reflection of its social and functional orientation // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Legal sciences. 2015. No. 10. 187–191. (In Russ.)
5. Galimov E. R. Improving the indictment as a way to transform criminal proceedings // Legal paradigm. 2023. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 40–46. (In Russ.)
6. Zaitsev A. A. Typical mistakes of the investigator when forming the indictment in a criminal case // Bulletin of the Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2021. No. 3. P. 18–26. (In Russ.)
7. Ivanov D. A. Activities of the investigator, inquiry officer to ensure compensation for harm caused by a crime when deciding to send a criminal case to court // Bulletin of Economic Security. 2017. No. 4. P. 166–171. (In Russ.)
8. Golova S. I. Procedural activities of the investigator to notify participants in criminal proceedings about the end of the preliminary investigation with an indictment // Society and Law. 2014. No. 3 (49). P. 166–170. (In Russ.)
9. Zvereva Yu. N. Proving the nature and extent of harm caused by a crime: abstract. dis. … Cand. of Law. Nizhny Novgorod, 2015. 31 p. (In Russ.)
10. Tomin V. T. Sharp angles of criminal proceedings. Moscow : Legal Literature. 1991. 240 p. (In Russ.)
11. Loginova N. G., Fedorova E. A. Features of the legal technique for drafting a resolution on bringing in as an accused // Bulletin of the Belgorod Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after I. D. Putilin. 2019. No. 1. P. 47–54. (In Russ.)
12. Ivanov D. A. Protection of the rights and legitimate interests of legal entities that have suffered from crimes by the investigator : monograph. Moscow : Yurltinform Publishing House, 2009. 136 p. (In Russ.)
13. Ibragimov S. M. On the issue of the base motive of the crime // Russian investigator. 2007. No. 9. P. 1–5. (In Russ.)
14. Guskova A. P., Muratova N. G. Judicial law: history and modernity of the judiciary in the sphere of criminal proceedings. Moscow, 2005. 110 p. (In Russ.)
