from 01.01.2021 until now
Nizhniy Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
Modern humanity is in an unstable state of its development; a search is underway for a way to transition societies to a new one. Today, social science faces difficulties in studying these processes. They are associated with their subject-object uncertainty. As a result, there is a need to expand the methodological and theoretical bases of research by attracting elements of similar bases of other paradigms. These processes lead to the emergence of a tendency toward paradigmatic synthesis in research. The article discusses linear, cyclical, synthetic (linear-cyclic) paradigms for understanding the historical process. In accordance with this classification, studies of transitional states of human development are systematized, these studies are analyzed for the presence of elements that are not characteristic of their paradigm. Using methods of paradigmatic systematization of research positions and phenomenological intentional analysis, a conclusion is made about the need for paradigmatic synthesis, and methodological conditions for the implementation of this synthesis are identified. Thus, we will methodologically carry out a synthesis of paradigms that recognize the principle of development, focusing on the dialectical law of qualitative and quantitative changes. It is possible to synthesize metaphysical paradigms that are not based on the principle of development. Paradigmatic synthesis of methodologically opposite paradigms (dialectical and metaphysical) is impossible.
transitional states of human development, historical process, paradigms of interpretation of history, paradigmatic synthesis, socio-economic formation, social system, civilization
1. Marx K., Engels F. Preface to “A Critique of Political Economy” // Selected works in two volumes. M. : OGIZ State Publishing House of Political Literature, 1949. Vol. 1. P. 321–322. (In Russ.)
2. Lenin V. I. The impending catastrophe and how to deal with it // Complete Works. Fifth edition. M. : Publishing house of political literature, 1967. Vol. 34. P. 151–199. (In Russ.)
3. Lenin V. I. Imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism // Complete Works. Fifth edition. M. : Publishing house of political literature, 1967. Vol. 27. P. 299–426. (In Russ.)
4. Mishin V. I. Social progress. Gorky : Volgo-Vyat. book publishing house, 1970. 296 p. (In Russ.)
5. Glezerman G. E. Laws of social development: their character and use. M. : Politizdat, 1979. 268 p. (In Russ.)
6. Izraitel V. Ya. The contradictory nature of transitional eras in world history // Philosophical problems of social progress: collection of scientific works. Gorky : Publishing house of Gorky University, 1982. P. 77–90. (In Russ.)
7. Drabkin Ya. S. Unsolved problems of studying social revolutions // Historical science and some problems of our time. Articles and discussions. M. : “Nauka”, 1969. P. 211–215. (In Russ.)
8. Krapivensky S. E. On the analysis of the category “social revolution”. Volgograd : Nizhne-Volzhskoe book publishing house, 1971. 183 p. (In Russ.)
9. Butenko A. P. Dialectics of social development. Kyiv : Politizdat of Ukraine, 1990. 317 p. (In Russ.)
10. Rakitov A. I. Historical knowledge: a systemic-epistemological approach. M. : Politizdat, 1982. 303 p. (In Russ.)
11. Gurevich A. Ya. Free peasantry of feudal Norway. M. : “Nauka”, 1967. 285 p. (In Russ.)
12. Musayelyan L. A. The theoretical heritage of Marx and modernity. Article two. Theory and practice of Marxism // Bulletin of Perm University. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology. 2020. Issue. 1. P. 14–28. (In Russ.)
13. Osin R.S. My Marx // Alternatives. 2018. No. 2. P. 71–78. (In Russ.)
14. Hong Ch. My Marx // Alternatives. 2018. No. 2. P. 91–97. (In Russ.)
15. Buzgalin A.V. The future of Marxism and the Marxism of the future // Alternatives. 2018. No. 2. P. 102–116. (In Russ.)
16. Buzgalin A.V. Answers to questions from the organizing committee of the Second International Marxist Congress. // Philosophical Sciences. Beijing : Peking University. 2018. No. 4. P. 80–95. (In Russ.)
17. Dialectics of national and social in the context of returning the status of a great power to the Fatherland : materials of the International Scientific Conference / Nizhny Novgorod regional branch of the All-Russian Public Organization “Russian Scientists of Socialist Orientation” (RUSO), All-Russian Academy of Human Sciences; Editorial Board: A. V. Grekhov (pres.) et al. Nizhny Novgorod, 2015. 177 p. (In Russ.)
18. Sagatovsky V. N. System activity and its philosophical understanding // System research. Methodological problems. Annual. 1980 / ed. D. M. Gvishiani et al. M. : Nauka, 1981. 402 p. (In Russ.)
19. Zubkevich L. A. Transitional periods as part of a natural historical process : dis. ... Cand. Philosophy. Nizhny Novgorod : Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N. I. Lobachevsky, 2005. 183 p. (In Russ.)
20. Shevyakova E. V. Stability and instability in natural and social systems : dis. ... Ph.D. Philosophy. M. : Russian Academy of Public Administration, 1995. 140 p. (In Russ.)
21. Sergeychik E. M. Philosophy of history. St. Petersburg : Publishing House «Lan» ; St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2002. 606 p. (In Russ.)
22. Bagno I .G. Sociocultural approach to the study of transition processes in modern Russia: abstract of thesis. dis. ... cand. philosopher. Sci. Omsk : Omsk State Agrarian University, 1998. 25 p. (In Russ.)
23. Glazyev S. Yu. Patterns of social evolution: questions of methodology // Analysis of systems on the threshold of the 21st century: theory and practice : materials of the international conference. In 4 volumes / comp. T. E. Safonova. M. : Intellect, 1996. Vol. 2. P. 5–10. (In Russ.)
24. Glazyev S. About the underlying causes of the growing chaos and measures to overcome the economic crisis // Glazyev.ru. URL: https://glazev.ru/articles/1-mirovoy-krizis/78041-o-glubinnykh-prichinakhnarastajushhego-khaosa-i-merakh-po-preodoleniju-jekonomicheskogo-krizisa (accessed 27.02.2024). (In Russ.)
25. Moiseev N. N. Strategy of the transition period // Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Vol. 65. 1995. No. 4. P. 291–295. (In Russ.)
26. Andreev I. L. Be careful with the history clock! (methodological problems of the civilization process) // Questions of Philosophy. 1998. No. 9. P. 38–54. (In Russ.)
27. Abrosimova I. A. Methodological role of the concept of civilization in socio-philosophical research : abstract. dis. ... Cand. Philosophy. Saratov: Saratov State Technical University, 2000. 19 p. (In Russ.)
28. Gizatullina G. A. Comparative analysis of formational and civilizational concepts (philosophical and methodological aspect): abstract. dis. ... Cand. Philosophy. Kazan : Kazan State University named after V. I. Ulyanov-LenIn Kazan, 2001. 23 p. (In Russ.)
29. Verevichev I. I., Verevicheva M. I., Erokhina E. A. Code of development of modern civilization // News of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018. Vol. 20. No. 4 (3). P. 514–520. (In Russ.)
30. Durkheim E. Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose. M. : Nauka, 1995. 349 p. (In Russ.)
31. Barieva A. A. Civilization theory of Yu. Yakovets: advantages and disadvantages // Global scientific potential. Professional education. 2019. No. 10 (103). P. 102–104. (In Russ.)
32. Nikolsky S. A. Russian philosophy of history: experience of understanding // Philosophical journal. 2018. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 115–128. (In Russ.)
33. Yepremyan M. A. Epistemological roots of conservative ideology, its genesis, features and development trends // Region and World. 2019. No. 5. P. 26–30. (In Russ.)
34. Galbraith J. K. Economic theories and goals of society. M. : Progress, 1979. 406 p. (In Russ.)
35. Bell D. The Coming Post-Industrial Society. M. : Academia, 2004. 944 p. (In Russ.)
36. Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. M. : AST, Ermak, 2005. 588 p. (In Russ.)
37. Hayek F. A. The Road to Serfdom. M. : “Economy”, 1992. 176 p. (In Russ.)
38. Weber M. Social causes of the fall of ancient culture // Favorites. The image of society. M. : Lawyer, 1994. P. 447–566. (In Russ.)
39. Shultz E. E. Theory of revolution: Revolutions and modern civilizations. M. : Lenand, 2016. 400 p. (In Russ.)
40. Abbasov R. G., Rimsky V. P. Subcultural revolutions in cultural-historical typology // Science. Art. Culture. 2018. No. 3 (19). P. 5–23. (In Russ.)
41. Filippov A. Triggers of absolute events // Logos. 2006. No. 5 (56). P. 104–117. (In Russ.)
42. Burnel E. Reforms and revolution // Problems of peace and socialism. 1964. No. 7. P. 34–38. (In Russ.)
43. Dvornichenko A. Yu. Evolution. Involution? Revolution! (In connection with the article by D. V. Puzanov “The “Revolution” of 1000 in Eastern Europe: the problem of proto- and post-revolutions”) // Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series History and Philology. 2019. Vol. 29. Issue. 1. P. 87–96. (In Russ.)
44. Puzanov D. V. Revolution: axiom, myth or abstraction? (answer to A. Yu. Dvornichenko) // Bulletin of the Udmurt University. 2019. Vol. 29. Issue. 4. P. 637–649. (In Russ.)
45. Lichman B. V. The theory of studying the history of Russia according to the goals of the worldview // Socio-political sciences. 2018. No. 4. P. 76–82. (In Russ.)
46. Tsarev R. Yu. “Macrohistory” by Randal Collins: methodological aspects // Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2019. No. 440. P. 90–98. (In Russ.)
47. Subbotina N. D. The problem of periodization of history: individual, special and general // Humanitarian vector. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 6–16. (In Russ.)
48. Lyubashits V. Ya. Evolutionary typology of the state: institutional and legal dimension // Scientific works of SZIU RANEPA. 2019. Volume 10. Issue 1 (38). P. 17–31. (In Russ.)
49. Martyushov L. N. Existing concepts of historical science // History and modern worldview. 2019. No. 1. P. 21–30. (In Russ.)
50. Popkov Yu. V., Tyugashev E. A. Sociocultural transformation: interpretation options, diagnostics of Russian experience // Idea and ideals. 2020. Volume 12. No. 1. Part 2. P. 405–421. (In Russ.)
51. Avilkina A. A. Typology of the state in legal science: from formational theory to civilizational diversity // Eurasian Union of Scientists (ESU). 2020. No. 3 (72). P. 33–35. (In Russ.)
52. Civilization: from local to global City : monograph. Series “Man. Culture. Civilization» / under. ed. L. A. Alekseeva and others. Donetsk : DonNSU, 2008. 236 p. (In Russ.)
53. Collins R. Macrohistory: Essays on the Sociology of Big Activity. M. : URSS: LANAND, 2015. 504 p. (In Russ.)
54. Kolesnikov V. A. The formation of transitological concepts in political and legal studies at the end of the twentieth century. // Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2007. No. 3. P. 22–28. (In Russ.)
55. Ravochkin N. N. The influence of philosophical ideas on political and legal institutions in the light of historical macrosociology // Bulletin of Tver State University. 2019. No. 2. P. 30–40. (In Russ.)
56. Rozov N. S. Historical macrosociology: formation, main directions of research and types of models // Social sciences and modernity. 2009. No. 2. P. 151–161. (In Russ.)
57. Rozov N. S. Philosophy and theory of history. Book I. Prolegomena. M. : Logos, 2002. 656 p. (In Russ.)
58. Lakatos I. Selected works on philosophy and methodology of science. M. : Academic project ; Trixta, 2008. 475 p. (In Russ.)
