UDK 347 Гражданское право. Судопроизводство
The article is devoted to certain issues concerning the need for the use of expert research and the degree of its evidentiary force in cases considered in the order of claim proceedings. In connection with the existing discussion, the author comes to the conclusion that the judge is not obliged to resort to expert research in each case of consideration of issues in the case, the content of which does not relate to legal knowledge and is not so-called “ordinary knowledge”. According to the author, expert research is often of a certifying nature and contributes to the correct interpretation of the court’s conclusions by persons interested in the lawsuit proceedings.
expertise, civil proceedings, claim proceedings, expert opinion
1. On the court decision : Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 19, 2003 No. 23 // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2004. No. 2. (In Russ.)
2. Vyshinsky A. Ya. The theory of judicial evidence in Soviet law. M. : Gosjurizdat, 1950. (In Russ.)
3. Pukshanskiy B. Ya. Obydennoe znanie. L. : Izd. LGU, 1987.
4. Terentyeva L. V. General legal presumption jura novit curia and branch presumption jura aliena novit curia of international civil procedure // Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2018. No. 3. P. 195. (In Russ.)
5. Filippov P. M., Mokhov A. A. Use of special knowledge in legal proceedings in Russia. Volgograd, 2003. (In Russ.)
6. Eisman A. A. Expert opinion (Structure and scientific justification). M. : Legal literature. 1967. P. 3. (In Russ.)
7. Pukshansky B. Ya. Ordinary knowledge. L. : Ed. Leningrad State University, 1987. (In Russ.)
