UDK 343.164 Прочие служащие уголовных судов
In the article the theoretical questions concerning problems of establishment and delimitation of procedural status of assistant judge and clerk of a court session are considered. The particulars of the participation of the above-mentioned persons, which are not regulated in Russian criminal procedure legislation, have been identified and analysed in detail (in section II of the Code of Criminal Procedure) articles 244.1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and article 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure refer to a situation of uncertainty. The author presents a wide list of competences of each participant, as well as an emphasis on the difference in sphere of activity. It is justified that the assistant judge and the clerk of the court session should be given the procedural status of an independent other participant in criminal proceedings.
assistant judge, rights and duties, procedural status, clerk of the court, participant in criminal proceedings
1. Mironova A. V. The applicant and the eyewitness as participants in criminal proceedings with anuncertain procedural status // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2015. No. 9. P. 84–87. (In Russ.)
2. Actual problems of criminal procedure law: textbook / S. V. Gurdin, E. N. Kleshchina etc.; under the general editorship of O. V. Khimicheva, O. V. Michurina. Moscow: Unity-Dana Publishing House, 2014. 288 p. (In Russ.)
3. Volobueva E. A. K voprosu o processual'nom statuse sekretarya sudebnogo zasedaniya i pomoschnika sud'i kak uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik SamGU. 2010. № 3 (77). S. 229–235.
4. Criminal Procedure. Problems of theory and practice: textbook / V. K. Bobrov, O. V. Volynskaya etc.; under the general editorship of A. V. Endoltseva, O. V. Khimicheva // Moscow: Unity-Dana Publishing House, 2019. 799 p. (In Russ.)
5. Vasina E. A. Prava i obyazannosti pomoschnika sud'i kak vazhneyshiy element administrativno-pravovogo statusa. Yuridicheskaya nauka. Pravo. M., 2013.
6. Davletov A. A. Problema statusa ugolovno-presleduemogo lica v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2015. № 4 (103). S. 61–67.
7. Smolkova I. V. Participants of criminal proceedings with an uncertain procedural status // Bulletin of the Baikal State University. 2017. No. 27 (2). P. 205–210. (In Russ.)
8. Latypov V. S. The secretary of the court session as another participant in criminal proceedings // Bulletin of Kaliningrad branch of St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2014. No. 2 (36). P. 132–134. (In Russ.)
9. Zelenina O. A. Suschnost' kategorii «uchastnik ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» v nauke ugolovno-processual'nogo prava // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2010. Vyp. 23. № 25. S. 238–244.
10. Volobueva E. A. On the issue of the procedural status of the secretary of the court session and the assistant judge as participants in criminal proceedings // Bulletin of the SamGU. 2010. No. 3 (77). P. 229–235. (In Russ.)
11. Vasina E. A. Rights and duties of an assistant judge as an essential element of administrative and legal status. Legal science. Right. M., 2013. (In Russ.)
12. Davletov A. A. The problem of the status of a criminally prosecuted person at the stage of initiating a criminal case // Russian Journal of Law. 2015. No. 4 (103). P. 61–67. (In Russ.)
13. Zelenina O. A. The essence of the category «participant in criminal proceedings» in the science of criminal procedure law // Bulletin of the South Ural State University. 2010. Issue. 23. No. 25. P. 238–244. (In Russ.)
