The article is devoted to the analysis of the frst part of Article 61 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The author analyzes the process of recognizing circumstances as well-known by the court and points out that this process is also evidence, and also offers his own wording of the frst part of Article 61 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.
well-known circumstances, proof, verifcation
1. Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of November 14, 2002 No. 137-FZ (as amended and supplemented on June 11, 2022) // Offcial Internet portal of legal information. URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru (date of access: 06.07.2022). (In Russ.)
2. Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of July 24, 2002 No. 95-FZ (as amended and supplemented on June 11, 2022 // ConsultantPlus System. URL: http://www.consultant.ru (date accessed: 06.07.2022). (In Russ.)
3. Tax Code of the Russian Federation (part one): Federal Law No. 146-FZ (as amended and supplemented on May 28, 2022 // ConsultantPlus System. URL: http://www.consultant.ru (date accessed: 06.07.2022). (In Russ.)
4. Kurylev S.V. Fundamentals of the theory of proof in Soviet justice. Minsk, 1969. P. 52. (In Russ.)
5. Evidence in civil proceedings: a practical training manual for universities / I. V. Reshetnikova. Moscow : Yurayt Publishing House, 2022. P. 23. (In Russ.)
6. Yudelson K. S. Problems of proof in the Soviet civil process. Moscow – Yekaterinburg, 2005. P. 542– 543. (In Russ.)
7. Gusyakova E. A. Well-known facts as circumstances not subject to proof in civil proceedings // Izvestiya TulGU. Economic and legal sciences. 2017. No. 4–2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obscheizvestnyefakty-kak-obstoyatelstva-ne-podlezhaschie-dokazyvaniyu-v-grazhdanskom-sudoproizvodstve (date of access: 18.07.2022). (In Russ.)
